|
|
Forums - Modelling / Figures |
The figures forum is for the discussion of construction and painting of figures and the tools and materials used. |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? |  |
| Date: | Dec 14, 2002 |
| From: | Julian Conde | |
Plastic still don't get the Depth resin can achieve , the very defined faces
, ears , hair ....
it's amazing .
I have Only resin figures , whatever they cost .
Regards
Julian
"Peter Ong" wrote in message
news:3dfba136@news.track-link.net...
> Tricky question. Yes and no.
>
> To sound preachy, WHAT is a military figure? A figure represents the REAL
HUMAN WARRIOR just as AFV kits represent the REAL AFV.
>
> As such, sometimes the resin makers really do get their homework correct.
Other times, sculptors "just dropped the ball."
>
> When I rate figures, I use the following criteria:
>
> * Did the sculptor THINK when he made the figure? (Having a gun and no
ammo...would the sculptor want to go to war looking like this? I
wouldn't...suicide!).
> * Is the figure proportional? (I can't believe the number of female
figures out there that somehow look squashed or too unproportional. And
they call them sexy?).
> * What "goodies" does the figure come with? (Seriously, if the sculptor
took all the time to make this figure once in his life, the sculptor should
have at least gave some gear so that the sculptor doesn't have to repeat
making this figure at a later date because he "forgot to include" something.
A good example is an architect. Architects design buildings to last a
lifetime. You don't want the same architect to come back when he's 90 years
old to add something he forgot or to correct a mistake in your house).
> * Features and "firsts." (There are many figure sculptors out there but
not all of them care to do their homework. A "man" looks the same for
thousands of years but gear and weapons change constantly as the years go
by. We buyers are doing our homework so there's no real excuse why the
sculptor shouldn't either).
> * Does the figure represent the time period it's created for? (Again, the
sculptor has the control for making the figure and the time period he
selected. If the figure doesn't represent the time period, one wonders why
the sculptor chose that time in the first place).
> * Does the pose look natural or exciting? (This can determine if the
sculptor really knows how to sculpt).
>
> When a resin figure gets all of the above correct, it really puts plastic
figures on the back burner.
>
> The main criteria for any figure is THOUGHT. How much thinking did the
sculptor put into this figure? Does the sculptor know his stuff because
after all, this is the sculptor's *job* and I pay for his work and thinking
process, not for the resin and the box.
>
> If plastic figures get the above correct, then I'll buy plastic.
Unfortunately, there hasn't been a lot of new 1/35 and /16 plastic figures
or the modern sort released recently.
>
> My two cents.
> Peter
> |
| |
|
|
 | Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - MSW - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Julian Conde - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Future Scope of Track-Link??? - Saul Garcia - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul A. Owen - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul Roberts - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - MSW - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Didn't see that - Peter Ong - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andy Herbert - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - A.Hill - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Federico Kereki - Dec 17, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Steve Frost - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andrew Herbert - Dec 17, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Damon Agretto - Dec 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 23, 2002 |
| . . . Here are some figure websites - Dave Lesko - Jan 4, 2003 |
|
|
