|
|
Forums - Modelling / Figures |
The figures forum is for the discussion of construction and painting of figures and the tools and materials used. |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Scope of Track-Link??? |  |
| Date: | Dec 15, 2002 |
| From: | Christophe Jacquemont | |
Peter,
I know you have this review online here as well as a book review on Roman
legions, however I just re-read the text explaining "What is Track-Link?" on
this site and this is what I saw :
=quote=
Anything to do with the hobby of building model AFVs is suitable for inclusion
in Track-Link. I am striving to represent all
types of AFV, from WW1 to modern times and AFVs of all countries
= unquote=
My views are that figures are discussed, reviewed, shown as long as they are
AFV related (tank and maintenance crews) or could be included in an AFV
diorama.
I fail to see how a Roman legionary (or Viking, or Napoleon) can in any way be
useful in that regard.
BUT that is just my personal opinion, others may beg to differ...
What do you all think?
Cheers,
Christophe
Peter Ong wrote:
> Agreed. The Verliden 120mm "Roman Legionnaire" is a classic example of
> exquisite sculpting. I wrote a review for TL that should be posted shortly.
>
> Peter |
| |
|
|
 | Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - MSW - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Julian Conde - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Future Scope of Track-Link??? - Saul Garcia - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul A. Owen - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul Roberts - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - MSW - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Didn't see that - Peter Ong - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andy Herbert - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - A.Hill - Dec 15, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Federico Kereki - Dec 17, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Steve Frost - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 16, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andrew Herbert - Dec 17, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Damon Agretto - Dec 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 23, 2002 |
| . . . Here are some figure websites - Dave Lesko - Jan 4, 2003 |
|
|
