Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 14 
   IndustryOct 14 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 13
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 14
   ContestsOct 13
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 13 
   ConstructionOct 13 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasOct 13 
   1-48th ScaleOct 13 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 13 
   Post WW2Oct 13 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 13 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - Modelling / Figures

The figures forum is for the discussion of construction and painting of figures and the tools and materials used.
Topics  778
Messages  3401
 Subject:  Didn't see thatList thread.  
  
 Date:  Dec 16, 2002
 From:  Peter Ong 
Haha, like Paul, I read the rules like four years ago when I wrote my first review. After that, I never read the rules since.

You're correct that the Roman Legionnaire doesn't fit and I agree that a digression from the rules might sow chaos in TL that would prove too hard to handle. You or Paul can take the Roman review off TL if so desired. No use changing the rules on my behalf.

I have two websites which I haven't touched since 1999. I intend to put all my reviews on one website someday so no loss to me if the Roman review is removed. As long as it's typed, it'll find a home somewhere :-)!

Peter
 
Thread Listing 
  Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - MSW - Dec 14, 2002
. . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 14, 2002
. . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Julian Conde - Dec 14, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: Are Resin Figures worth the hype and price? - Peter Ong - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Future Scope of Track-Link??? - Saul Garcia - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul A. Owen - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Paul Roberts - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - MSW - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Didn't see that - Peter Ong - Dec 16, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andy Herbert - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - A.Hill - Dec 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 16, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Federico Kereki - Dec 17, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Steve Frost - Dec 16, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 16, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Andrew Herbert - Dec 17, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 21, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Damon Agretto - Dec 23, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Scope of Track-Link??? - Warrink - Dec 23, 2002
. . . Here are some figure websites - Dave Lesko - Jan 4, 2003
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link