Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralNov 19 
   IndustryNov 17 
   Shows & ClubsNov 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsNov 20
   ReviewsNov 15
   GalleryNov 19
   ContestsNov 10
 Modelling Forums
   KitsNov 20 
   ConstructionNov 20 
   PaintingNov 18 
   FiguresNov 20 
   DioramasNov 11 
   1-48th ScaleNov 18 
   Small ScaleNov 1 
 Research Forums
   WW2Nov 20 
   Post WW2Nov 20 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellNov 20 
   CommercialNov 19 
 

Forums - Modelling / Figures

The figures forum is for the discussion of construction and painting of figures and the tools and materials used.
Topics  783
Messages  3427
 Subject:  Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Apr 26, 2006
 From:  gerry gardiner 
I agree. They don't come any more conservative than myself. I have no use for political correctness. But this is simply unneccesary. The shoe shiner doesn't just have a dark skin tone, the guy is black.
In German propaganda the black GI came in for some really horrible treatment, real Sambo stuff, and this SS Guy is simply humiliating his captive.

If verlinden needs ideas for figure sets, he could ask.With all the interest in MidEast armor, how many Arab crews do we have to chose from?

Gerry


BTW, I haven't seen the SS troops taking a crap either and I'd really rather not.
 
Thread Listing 
  Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Herve Charbonneau - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - gerry gardiner - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - James Wechsler - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Mike Peplinski - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . . . . No we don't need it... but it's good to discuss. - Andrew Herbert - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Vote with thy wallet - Kip Rudge - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Michel - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Christopher C. Tew - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Jim Wechsler - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Christopher C. Tew - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Evan August - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Christopher C. Tew - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Andrew Herbert - Apr 27, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Paul A. Owen - Apr 26, 2006
. . . I don't care one way or another... - David Nickels - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . Poor quality figures - Roy Chow - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Very poor quality figures - Herve Charbonneau - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Poor quality figures - Frank Blanton - Apr 27, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Evan August - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Michael Wawrow - Apr 26, 2006
. . . So build him assembling a booby trap - Dan LeClair - Apr 26, 2006
. . . . . . Re: So build him assembling a booby trap - Cliff Mathewson - Apr 26, 2006
. . . Do we need this? - I don't get it. - Glenn Gerson - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Do we need this? - I don't get it. - Dan Rosecrans - Apr 27, 2006
. . . Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Steve C - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Glen - Apr 27, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Tim Streeter - Apr 27, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - adam lehmann - Apr 28, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - gerry gardiner - Apr 28, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Tim Streeter - Apr 28, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Simon Barnes - Apr 29, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Tim Streeter - Apr 29, 2006
. . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Glen - Apr 29, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Rod - May 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? [IMG] - Steve C - May 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Tim Streeter - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Steve C - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? - Rod - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Verlinden figure subjects - Do we need this? [IMG] - Steve C - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Attractiveness - Roy Chow - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Attractiveness - Rod - May 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Attractiveness [IMG] - Rod - May 14, 2006
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link