Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 12 
   IndustryOct 12 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 12
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 12
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 13 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 12 
   Post WW2Oct 12 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 12 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - Modelling / Kits

The kits forum is for the discussion of model kits. Typically questions on availability or certain subjects and quality of existing kits are posted here. Short reviews are good here too.

Topics  1240
Messages  7573
 Subject:  The ultimate in nitpicking (2)List thread.  
  
 Date:  Jan 1, 2005
 From:  Kurt Laughlin 
1. The NMSC-Cicero foundry symbol is incorrect. It should be an H inside of a C, not two mirror image Ds. See

http://web.inter.nl.net/users/spoelstra/g104/foundry.htm

2. For some variety, you could add a small rectangular pad on the right (dark) wing. There were NMSC-Cicero bogies with the circles and no pad, with only the pad, and with both, and with neither.

4. There should be some small marks alonside the center two webs.

5. The foundry marking on the arm should be OSF, not OSE (Ordnance Steel Foundries).

6. The circular knockout marks at the ends of the lever under the bolts that hold the wear pads should be removed.

7. The combination of the earlier skid and the spacer block under the roller was probably not as common as the late skid with spacer. The late skid came into production at the end of 1942 while the spacer modification didn't happen until the very end of July 1943. Although the combination is certainly possible, it was the extreme wear of the earlier skids that lead to spacing the rollers in the first place. It looks like most of the earlier skids had been replaced by the late style by the time the spacers came along.

8. To go with an "early" theme, they probably should have used different arms that used screws in threaded holes to hold the rubbing plates rather than the later types with oval holes to allow nuts.

Note that the different markings on the ancillary parts in my earlier photo do not indicate anything wrong with the Tasco set. This is just one existing combination.

KL
 
Thread Listing 
  Tasca M4 Bogie kits - Paul A. Owen - Dec 30, 2004
. . . Re: Tasca M4 Bogie kits - mike foncannon - Dec 30, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Tasca M4 Bogie kits - Paul A. Owen - Dec 30, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Tasca M4 Bogie kits - Mike Land - Dec 31, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Tasca M4 Bogie kits - Paul A. Owen - Dec 31, 2004
. . . . . . . . . M4 Hybrid Bogeys - mike foncannon - Jan 1, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Thanks Mike n/t - Mike Land - Jan 1, 2005
. . . Re: Tasca M4 Bogie kits - Leo Lee - Dec 31, 2004
. . . Re: first image - Leo Lee - Jan 1, 2005
. . . . . . Re: second image - Leo Lee - Jan 1, 2005
. . . . . . . . . The ultimate in nitpicking (2) - Kurt Laughlin - Jan 1, 2005
. . . . . . The ultimate in nitpicking (1) [IMG] - Kurt Laughlin - Jan 1, 2005
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link