Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 6 
   IndustrySep 6 
   Shows & ClubsSep 6 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 5
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 6
   ContestsSep 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 5 
   ConstructionSep 6 
   PaintingSep 5 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleSep 6 
   Small ScaleSep 6 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 6 
   Post WW2Sep 5 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 5 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - Modelling / Kits

The kits forum is for the discussion of model kits. Typically questions on availability or certain subjects and quality of existing kits are posted here. Short reviews are good here too.

Topics  1212
Messages  7401
 Subject:  Dragon Firefly Vc inaccuraciesList thread.  
  
 Date:  Feb 17, 2006
 From:  Blair Quinn 
Hello all;

I'd like to get clarification on one of those issues that keep coming up in the armour world.

Exactly what is wrong with the rear hull shape and idler positioning of Dragon's first 2 releases of their Firefly Vc (6031 and 6121)?

Is there a place I can find this already explained? I tried but can't find one on the net. I hear that the hull is too long but I thought the M-4A4 hull (on which the Vc was built) was longer than normal due to the 5 automoble engines installed.

By the way, is the error on these kits carried over onto the 2 Dragon M-4A4 kits (6035 and 6041)?

Thanks beforehand all;

Blair
 
Thread Listing 
  Dragon Firefly Vc inaccuracies - Blair Quinn - Feb 17, 2006
. . . Re: Firefly Vc inaccuracies first two Dragon releases - James Bilbrey - Feb 17, 2006
. . . Lots of errors in all of the older M4A4 based kits - David Nickels - Feb 18, 2006
. . . Re: Dragon Firefly Vc inaccuracies - Gerald Owens - Feb 19, 2006
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link