|
|
Forums - Modelling / Kits |
The kits forum is for the discussion of model kits. Typically questions on availability or certain subjects and quality of existing kits are posted here. Short reviews are good here too. |
| Topics | 1301 |
| Messages | 7906 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) | |
| Date: | Sep 18, 2006 |
| From: | Damon Agretto | |
I really think the Cavalier sets are better made in terms of fitting the model. I used the Cavalier set for the Tamiya Panther G, and it fit nearly like a glove. There were a few airbubbles though in some of the parts (principally the rear hull). I additionally use the Atak set for the DML StuG IV Early. It has a better pattern, but the fit is much more dodgy. So far I've only completed the lower hull, and while I had to modify the pieces anyway (I'm using the Tristar suspension kit...since DML thoughtfully packaged the next gen Panzer IV hull but not the bogie mounts!), some of the other areas were pretty dodgy...
Damon. |
| |
|
|
 | Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit for DML Tiger 1 - Allan J. Mata - Sep 18, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Damon Agretto - Sep 18, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Damon Agretto - Sep 18, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Jerry Plettenberg - Sep 19, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Erik Von Dalmstadt - Sep 19, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Allan J. Mata - Sep 19, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Thomas J. Deimling - Sep 19, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit (for DML's late Tiger 1 (3-in-1) - Michael Dworacek - Sep 20, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Atak vs. Cavalier Zimmerit for DML Tiger 1 - Tony - Sep 20, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Atak Availability - Roger Cockburn - Sep 20, 2006 |
|
|