|
|
Forums - Modelling / Kits |
The kits forum is for the discussion of model kits. Typically questions on availability or certain subjects and quality of existing kits are posted here. Short reviews are good here too. |
| Topics | 1302 |
| Messages | 7907 |
|
|
| Subject: | Advice |  |
| Date: | Nov 11, 2006 |
| From: | Mike Tittel | |
Opinion only: Building these things takes so much time and passion, money for paint etc., why bother not starting with the best kit?
Unless you find something at a garage sale or whatnot go ahead and seek the DML kits out. They are really great Tiger kits. My second choice would be any of the Tamiya TIger I kits. They are a tad easier to build but also have more innacurracies than the DML kits. But in the scheme of things you have got to be really informed and precise to arrive at a "perfectly accurate" project.
Both companies do a great job.
To your point if you don't want anything over 5 years old (strange restriction perhaps?) you should go with the DML offerings. |
| |
|
|
 | Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - dominic miele - Nov 10, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Paul A. Owen - Nov 10, 2006 |
| . . . Advice - Mike Tittel - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . Well, if ya only want the best... - Jason Burch - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Tamiya "Fruhe" kit? - Paul A. Owen - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Tamiya "Fruhe" kit? - Roger Cockburn - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Tamiya "Fruhe" kit? - rob galassi - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Okinawa - Roger Cockburn - Nov 12, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Tamiya "Fruhe" kit? - Gerald Owens - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Well, if ya only want the best... - David Byrden - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML?/ Tamiya kits - Marc Brandes - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Gerald Owens - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - David Byrden - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Christopher C. Tew - Nov 12, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - David Byrden - Nov 12, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Gerald Owens - Nov 12, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - George Sauer - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . Thanks for the suggestions - dominic miele - Nov 11, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Lawrence Selberg - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . . . . sad but true - dominic miele - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . Leave the StuGs and semitracks alone! - Ken Hartlen - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Leave the StuGs and semitracks alone! - dominic miele - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Rick - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . . . . One problem with that theory - Jason Burch - Nov 13, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . He's right - David Byrden - Nov 14, 2006 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: One problem with that theory - Eric Scurlock - Nov 14, 2006 |
| . . . . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Dennis - Nov 14, 2006 |
| . . . Re: Tiger I kits, quality ones besides DML? - Elbongo Alonso - Nov 22, 2006 |
|
|
