Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralAug 29 
   IndustryAug 29 
   Shows & ClubsAug 24 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsAug 29
   ReviewsAug 13
   GalleryAug 29
   ContestsAug 18
 Modelling Forums
   KitsAug 25 
   ConstructionAug 29 
   PaintingAug 28 
   FiguresAug 29 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleAug 27 
   Small ScaleAug 22 
 Research Forums
   WW2Aug 28 
   Post WW2Aug 26 
   Pre WW2Aug 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellAug 27 
   CommercialAug 25 
 

Forums - Modelling / Painting

The painting forum is for the discussion of techniques on the painting, decalling and weathering phases of AFV modelling and the tools and materials used.

Topics  1365
Messages  6917
 Subject:  Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Feb 19, 2005
 From:  Al Crawford 
Just to throw another scale effect into the mix, it's not just the color that's wrong, it's the glossiness (or lack thereof) of surfaces. Basically the real sun is way too big for models, which generally results in shows being softer than they should, specular highlights being larger and sharper than they should.

The whole scale effect thing has inspired more holy wars than almost any modeling subject I can think of. The problem is that you get people who meticulously add white to their colors to simulate scale effect, yet ignore the fact that by doing so they really need to specify the clarify ot the atmospheric conditions we're supposed to be viewing their tank or plane under, as well as the exact distance we should be viewing it from for the scale effect to be correct. Then, having carefully tweaked their colors, they apply the kit decals neat and use Future to make sure their canopy (if it's a plane) is super-shiny. Same goes for gloss finishes - and how do you adjust the finish of something that's dead flat to begin with?

I've long decided to just stick with what I think looks right. You can take the realism thing too far - adjust the paint colors, fiddle with the finish, visit the location to be modeled to take soil samples so you can mix up your pigments to get the mud color correct, add the most fanatical Aber detail set in existence, then paint it a shade of green that you took off an actual Russian tank of the correct vintage, but which is utterly wrong because the original subject hadn't been sitting outside in the rain for 60 years and was painted a different color to start with anyway.

My all-purpose technique is the use of "must". It's a heavily thinned (at least 50/50, more to taste) mix of Pollyscale Mud and Pollyscale Dust. The ratios of the two vary depends on...well, basically on whatever I feel like on any given day, although generally its 80 or 90% dust to 10% mud. Mix it up, mist it on sparingly, preferably from a distance. The mixture:

1. Makes the tank look a bit dusty. Lots of tanks get dusty. Realism!
2. Lightens the overall color of everything. Woo, instant scale effect!
3. Depending upon consistency, it can pop out details too, rather like a subtle dry-brush.
4. Flattens the overall finish a little - another scale effect!

Really, all I can say about "must" is that it results in my tanks looking the way I want them to. They might look great to some, like over-weathered messes to others, and excessively neat and clean to yet others.

Let's face it - all color manipulation and weathering can fall into one of two categories as it is. There's "faked realism" and there's "artistic enhancement". I use them both. Neither reflects reality, but together I find they give a pleasing result. I don't care about winning competitions, so at the end of the day that's all that counts.

Al

PS It strikes me that adding white isn't even very realistic for faking atmospheric haze. Shouldn't it be a very pale blue for clear air, or perhaps a very pale beige if the subject is being filmed at a time of year when pollen levels are high, or a pale grey if there's a lot of smoke from battle.

PPS I'm also thinking of some of the hoops you have to jump through with the f-stop values on a digital camera when trying to produce an HDRI image. I wonder if any of the issues that require that apply to models, too.
 
Thread Listing 
  Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Saul Garcia - Feb 17, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - John Barnicoat - Feb 17, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Steve Campbell - Feb 17, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Paul A. Owen - Feb 18, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Ardell Bourgeois - Feb 18, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - David Byrden - Feb 19, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Steve Dowty - Feb 19, 2005
. . . Re: Paging Professor Herbert - Paul A. Owen - Feb 19, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Al Crawford - Feb 19, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - John Prigent - Feb 20, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Great Point John! - Saul Garcia - Feb 20, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - David Byrden - Feb 22, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? (Longish) - Thomas Naser - Feb 21, 2005
. . . Re: Does scale effect really exist for WWII AFVs? - Rick Bennett - Feb 22, 2005
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link