Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 11 
   IndustryOct 11 
   Shows & ClubsOct 9 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 11
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 11
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 12 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 11 
   Post WW2Oct 10 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 11 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - Modelling / Smallscale

The construction forum is for the discussion of small scale AFV modelling. Usually this refers to 1-76th and 1-72nd scale AFVs.
Topics  798
Messages  2875
 Subject:  Re: Gert: This link and the replies.List thread.  
  
 Date:  Oct 5, 2005
 From:  Josef Davis 
I got the dragon version of nashorn and I know what I have bought without any misleading from the "1st look". I believe that every experienced modelers will get an idea in mind what kind of challenge they are going to have after a glance.

It's thrilling with pleasure when I opened this kit and found the level of details it reached and I was mentally prepared to spend some series timing to enjoy it, instead of rushing and claim that the kit is hard to build, run into trouble ... etc. However when I read from the beginning of this thread I do feel like this comparison is not solely targetting on the pros and cons of the two kits, but persuading and convincing others the idea, that the R kit is better than the D kit so why not just buy the R kit, which I do not need. Thanks but just stop it.
 
Thread Listing 
  1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. [IMG] - Gert ten Brink - Oct 2, 2005
. . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. prt 2 [IMG] - Gert ten Brink - Oct 2, 2005
. . . . . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. prt 3 [IMG] - Gert ten Brink - Oct 2, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. prt 4 [IMG] - Gert ten Brink - Oct 2, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . I'm waiting for the Revell model - Michael Withington - Oct 2, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: I'm waiting for the Revell model - christopher benjamin - Oct 3, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Can you give me the link? - Gert ten Brink - Oct 3, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I am confused - Gordon Nickels - Oct 3, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: I am confused - Gert ten Brink - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: I am confused - christopher wilson - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reviews. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews. - christopher wilson - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: I am confused - Gordon Nickels - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . My poor English - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. prt 4 - Gabriel W. - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revell barrels - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. - Doug Chaltry - Oct 3, 2005
. . . . . . Please don't Trumpeteer make one. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 3, 2005
. . . Re: 1/72 Nashorn, Dragon vs. Revell. - David Forster - Oct 3, 2005
. . . . . . Detail on the Dragon kit. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Detail on the Dragon kit. - David Forster - Oct 4, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Detail on the Dragon kit. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Detail on the Dragon kit. - John Colin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Detail on the Dragon kit. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Detail on the Dragon kit. - Tom Fiocchi - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert my pictures are... - christopher benjamin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert my pictures are... - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert my pictures are... [IMG] - Sean Ryan - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert my pictures are... - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert here's a pic [IMG] - christopher benjamin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: and one more... [IMG] - christopher benjamin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thank you for the pics. - Gert ten Brink - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gert: This link and the replies. - christopher benjamin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert: This link and the replies. - John Colin - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert: This link and the replies. - Gordon Nickels - Oct 5, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Gert: This link and the replies. - Josef Davis - Oct 5, 2005
. . . What is the point of this thread? - Saul Garcia - Oct 6, 2005
. . . . . . Re: What is the point of this thread? - Gert ten Brink - Oct 6, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: What is the point of this thread? - Saul Garcia - Oct 6, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What is the point of this thread? - Gert ten Brink - Oct 6, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What is the point of this thread? - Gert ten Brink - Oct 7, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Contact - valid e-mail addresses - Paul A. Owen - Oct 8, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Contact - valid e-mail addresses - Gert ten Brink - Oct 8, 2005
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link