|
|
Forums - News / General |
For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby. |
| Topics | 2990 |
| Messages | 22338 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: I have to agree to Kip, but.... |  |
| Date: | Nov 3, 2005 |
| From: | R.C. Hill | |
You said that 'The[y] said they would build the most accurate 4E model ever made and that is what they did'...we're all forgetting that they are the only ones to box a kit for that purpose...there's the MB models conversion, and Tom Cockle built his Pz IV E using a Tamiya H, but really, this is the only Pz IV really made to be an E....
I believe you are right when you say 'I happen to beleive that every single panzer 4 was not built from a cookie cutter'...I forgot about how many were made, but really, after such a long time duration of production and any changes that would occur with the design, I think specifics are irrelevant...I can hear what Paul's saying with some things, like the glacis plate hatches, and with some of what Kazutaka is saying over at M-L (like the dirve sproket being a little to low because relative the pictures he showed, that's noticable), but when it comes to the 'cheeks' of the turret, then that's going a bit to far....It still looks like a Panzer IV turret either way...I suppose at least with all that's being pointed out there and discussed, at least Dragon will have a chance to make a 'near flawless' Panzer IV D and C and any future Panzer IV really.... |
| |
|
|
 | Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Saul Garcia - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Kimihide Kaneko - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Andrew Herbert - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Bob Wells - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Pushed not from this site...I hope! - Saul Garcia - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Ummm waitammit.... - Kip Rudge - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Jumping to the wrong conclusions - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Jumping to the wrong conclusions - Kip Rudge - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Ummm waitammit.... - Steve Campbell - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: I have to agree to Kip, but.... - R.C. Hill - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Bob Wells - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: I'd add an interior to a perfect kit. - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Greg Harker - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Brandon Sutherland - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Brandon - Brian Bocchino - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Steve Campbell - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Greg Harker - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Analogy - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Saul Garcia - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: The REAL problem - Paul A. Owen - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . Maybe because it's WWII German? - Kevin Johnson - Nov 3, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Ross Jarvis - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . A matter of perspective. - David B. - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . More a matter of proper English - Saul Garcia - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: More a matter of proper English - Brian Bocchino - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Really? The amount of work is irrelevant - Saul Garcia - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Really? The amount of work is irrelevant - Brian Bocchino - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . let's look at the definitions first... - Saul Garcia - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: let's look at the definitions first... - Eugene Boehringer - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . Just to point out, the definition isn't the issue. - David B. - Nov 4, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - frank forster - Nov 5, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Steve Campbell - Nov 5, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - frank forster - Nov 6, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Steve Campbell - Nov 6, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Why are we nit picking the DML Pz. IV E? - Frank Forster - Nov 7, 2005 |
| . . . But what happens when Dragon says forget it????? - mike brimer - Nov 6, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Why would Dragon say forget it? - Saul Garcia - Nov 6, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why would Dragon say forget it? - mike brimer - Nov 7, 2005 |
|
|
