Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralNov 18 
   IndustryNov 17 
   Shows & ClubsNov 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsNov 18
   ReviewsNov 15
   GalleryNov 19
   ContestsNov 10
 Modelling Forums
   KitsNov 18 
   ConstructionNov 18 
   PaintingNov 18 
   FiguresNov 18 
   DioramasNov 11 
   1-48th ScaleNov 18 
   Small ScaleNov 1 
 Research Forums
   WW2Nov 17 
   Post WW2Nov 19 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellNov 18 
   CommercialNov 12 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  3037
Messages  22932
 Subject:  Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradationList thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 12, 2006
 From:  michael kenny 
Sink, flash and shorts effect all moulding operations and the only way to eliminate them is to have a quality control system that scraps the defective parts.
For even the most basic automotive part you always have some form of problem and there are stringent standards as to how many defective parts a supplier will accept from a moulding firm. The number of defects is counted in parts per million (PPM) Yes that is parts per MILLION, say 10 or 20!
The current standards are aimed at ZERO defects so I think any kit manufacturer who allows defective parts into the box clearly has far lower quality standards than the firm who make the simple lever that allows you to move your car seat back and forward.
The only reason you get flash is because the moulder is too greedy to scrap the parts that have the flash. Even if the tool was worn and had a problem with flash you could run the tool at a lower specification and accept some shorts that would be reground. It seems these firms are packing everything.
 
Thread Listing 
  Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Bill Goodrich - Jul 12, 2006
. . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Gerald Owens - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Christopher C. Tew - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - michael kenny - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - John Barnicoat - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I've only seen one kit that badly done. - Hans haase - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Kurt Laughlin - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Patrizio - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Scott Dimmick - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Patrizio - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - michael kenny - Jul 13, 2006
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link