Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 7 
   IndustryOct 6 
   Shows & ClubsOct 6 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 6
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 7
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 6 
   ConstructionOct 6 
   PaintingOct 2 
   FiguresOct 6 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 7 
   Post WW2Oct 6 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 7 
   CommercialOct 3 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2987
Messages  22307
 Subject:  Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradationList thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 12, 2006
 From:  Kurt Laughlin 
>A few comments on Michael's comments:

>"Sink, flash and shorts effect all moulding operations and the only way to eliminate them is to have a quality control system that scraps the defective parts."

>It's more effective to make quality part of the manufacturing process. Educated and experiencing manufacturing people know that it actually costs more and is less effective to add quality after the fact than to build it in from the start. That means robust design, carefully controlled processes, etc. right up front that will guarantee improved product quality, customer satisfaction and return-on-investment.

I agree. Sink is typically a result of poor part design while shorts indicate poor mold design. Flash can be avoided by better clamping, better mold design, and better manufacturing. In other words, you are better off doing what it takes to only make good parts rather than wasting more effort to scrap the bad ones.

KL
CMfgE
 
Thread Listing 
  Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Bill Goodrich - Jul 12, 2006
. . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Gerald Owens - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Christopher C. Tew - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - michael kenny - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - John Barnicoat - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I've only seen one kit that badly done. - Hans haase - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Kurt Laughlin - Jul 12, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Patrizio - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Scott Dimmick - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - Patrizio - Jul 13, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Model manufacturing question - mould degradation - michael kenny - Jul 13, 2006
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link