Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 13 
   IndustryOct 13 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 13
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 13
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 13 
   ConstructionOct 13 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 13 
   Post WW2Oct 12 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 13 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2990
Messages  22338
 Subject:  Re: What constitutes parts plagerism?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Aug 18, 2006
 From:  frank forster 
Well,
i my eyes it is this:
if one makes a conversion for a specific model (for example Italeri SdKfz 234) of course it is ok to modify parts of that kit to produce the master of the new kit. Because so you get the best result in terms of fit and accuracy. And the initial manufacturer of the new model will sell another kit to complete the conversion to a model.

if one makes a conversion of a specific resin model of another manufacturer it would be the same thing.

but if he made a complete model using someone elses work, he should at least search the contact of the creator and talk about his plans.
There are some cooperations in modelbusiness i know of.
But some manufacturers are in war condition to others.
If it was me, i would go and completely and accurately rebuilt the parts i need from scratch. What would anyone do against this?

But again: what if the manufacturer of a kit is not on the market anymore?

regards
Frank
 
Thread Listing 
  What constitutes parts plagerism? - Alex Hill - Aug 17, 2006
. . . Re: What constitutes parts plagerism? - Paul A. Owen - Aug 17, 2006
. . . . . . That VLS turret - Saul Garcia - Aug 17, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Re: That VLS turret - David E Harper - Aug 18, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: That VLS turret Late Model - Saul Garcia - Aug 18, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: That VLS turret - Paul A. Owen - Aug 18, 2006
. . . . . . Re: What constitutes parts plagerism? - Gerald Owens - Aug 18, 2006
. . . Re: What constitutes parts plagerism? - David Manning - Aug 17, 2006
. . . Re: What constitutes parts plagerism? - frank forster - Aug 18, 2006
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link