Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralAug 20 
   IndustryAug 15 
   Shows & ClubsAug 14 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsAug 20
   ReviewsAug 13
   GalleryAug 20
   ContestsAug 18
 Modelling Forums
   KitsAug 20 
   ConstructionAug 20 
   PaintingAug 19 
   FiguresAug 19 
   DioramasAug 20 
   1-48th ScaleAug 18 
   Small ScaleJul 25 
 Research Forums
   WW2Aug 20 
   Post WW2Aug 15 
   Pre WW2Aug 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellAug 18 
   CommercialAug 16 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2943
Messages  21704
 Subject:  Re: Military In Scale, September 2001List thread.  
  
 Date:  Aug 21, 2001
 From:  Andrew Herbert 
MIS and Military Modelcraft Intl both suffer from poor photos I find.

There are often heavily pixelated images and bad color balance.

I think they are suffering from a too-rapid change over to digital imaging technology and/or poor editorial control. It definitely impacts on my decision to buy the
magazine, especially when they are $8 a copy or so.

Andy
 
Thread Listing 
  Military In Scale, September 2001 - Christophe Jacquemont - Aug 16, 2001
. . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - Tom Cockle - Aug 21, 2001
. . . . . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - Christophe Jacquemont - Aug 21, 2001
. . . . . . . . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - Andrew Herbert - Aug 21, 2001
. . . . . . . . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - John Harris - Aug 21, 2001
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - Christophe Jacquemont - Aug 22, 2001
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Military In Scale, September 2001 - Andrew Herbert - Aug 22, 2001
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link