Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralJul 19 
   IndustryJul 19 
   Shows & ClubsJul 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsJul 20
   ReviewsJun 26
   GalleryJul 20
   ContestsJul 19
 Modelling Forums
   KitsJul 20 
   ConstructionJul 15 
   PaintingJul 19 
   FiguresJul 7 
   DioramasJul 19 
   1-48th ScaleJun 27 
   Small ScaleJul 17 
 Research Forums
   WW2Jul 17 
   Post WW2Jul 12 
   Pre WW2Jun 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellJul 19 
   CommercialJul 19 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2911
Messages  21177
 Subject:  Re: Kits that need a little corretion, more attractive?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Mar 19, 2008
 From:  Sean Langley 
I think it depends what you mean by "correction". If it's an error that MUST be corrected to produce an accurate rendition, I'd be surprised if it were welcomed. I know the old adage is that there's no such thing as bad publicity, but some of the treatment that even the most trivial errors attract must make manufacturers wish they'd stuck with flowerpots. Speaking for myself, I can live with small errors, as I know the square root of chuff all about the correct spacing of bolts on a mantlet. But if it's, like, too many wheels, or an upside-down gun, or missing track pads, I tend to avoid it like the plague. (Nonetheless I harbour a sneaking suspicion that some errors are a conspiracy between the primary manufacturer and the after-market - "if we make this mistake and you do a correction set, we'll both clean up". But mostly I subscribe to the cock-up theory of history, not the conspiracy theory.)

But if you mean something that's less than perfect because of the limitations of moulding technology, that's different. It's a chance to take a kit beyond what's provided and really do a number on it. As my skills fall miles short of that, I don't do it myself, but I imagine it must be much more welcome in the market. Someone who sells a "good starting point" or "fine out of the box" will hopefully do better than someone who sells "looks approximately like the real thing if the light's dim".

seán
 
Thread Listing 
  Kits that need a little corretion, more attractive? - DK - Mar 19, 2008
. . . Yes, indeed - Bob Layton - Mar 19, 2008
. . . Re: Kits that need a little corretion, more attractive? - Sean Langley - Mar 19, 2008
. . . Nope. - Fred Schwarz - Mar 19, 2008
. . . . . . What Fred said - Bruce Probst - Mar 19, 2008
. . . . . . . . . Ok, besides Academy - DK - Mar 19, 2008
. . . Look at the industry leaders - James Wechsler - Mar 20, 2008
. . . . . . Well put - DK - Mar 20, 2008
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link