Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralNov 22 
   IndustryNov 22 
   Shows & ClubsNov 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsNov 21
   ReviewsNov 15
   GalleryNov 22
   ContestsNov 10
 Modelling Forums
   KitsNov 22 
   ConstructionNov 21 
   PaintingNov 18 
   FiguresNov 20 
   DioramasNov 11 
   1-48th ScaleNov 22 
   Small ScaleNov 1 
 Research Forums
   WW2Nov 22 
   Post WW2Nov 21 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellNov 22 
   CommercialNov 19 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  3039
Messages  22966
 Subject:  Re: As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002)List thread.  
  
 Date:  Apr 15, 2002
 From:  Kurt Laughlin 
"Paul Roberts"

> The AMPS nationals attempts (with pretty good success) to codify the
scoring for the various areas of building a model with points
> awarded for accuracy, finish, construction etc. Blow the accuracy and it
pretty much impossible to get a Gold medal even if everything else > is
perfect.

That's not technically correct, just practically correct. _IF_ everything
else was "perfect", accuracy only counts for 1 point from each judge so it
would be possible to win a gold in everything but Masters, I believe. The
reality is, however, that invariably mistakes in accuracy are accompanied by
mistakes in the other areas of more or less the same magnitude. In other
words, most models and modelers are pretty well proportioned across the
categories. There are many (like me) who are really good in one or two
aspects (say, accuracy) but only middling in most others. The reverse -
where someone is exceptionally good in all areas save one where he stinks -
is virtually non-existent.

On the other hand, I'd say it was virtually impossible for an AMPS model
with "nine 10s and a 0", as it were, to win a "Best of" category.

KL
 
Thread Listing 
  As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002) - Christophe Jacquemont - Apr 14, 2002
. . . Re: As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002) - MSW - Apr 14, 2002
. . . . . . Re: As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002) - Paul Roberts - Apr 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002) - Kurt Laughlin - Apr 15, 2002
. . . Here's how they were judged - Mark Ford - Apr 14, 2002
. . . . . . O.M.G.! Tamiya's OLD King Tiger winning best 1/35!!! My Hypothesis (2 cents): - Yuchung Wang - Apr 15, 2002
. . . . . . . . . The above post is not to be taken too seriously. Please! :^P n/t - Yuchung Wang - Apr 15, 2002
. . . . . . Re: Here's how they were judged - Paul Roberts - Apr 15, 2002
. . . Re: As long as it looks good don't bother about accuracy (Tamiyacon 2002) - Brent McCombs - Apr 29, 2002
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link