Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 5 
   IndustrySep 5 
   Shows & ClubsSep 5 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 5
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 5
   ContestsSep 5
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 5 
   ConstructionSep 5 
   PaintingSep 5 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleAug 27 
   Small ScaleSep 4 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 5 
   Post WW2Sep 5 
   Pre WW2Aug 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 5 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2962
Messages  21966
 Subject:  Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 1, 2008
 From:  Bill Goodrich 
I think, as with all things plastic, it depends on how they are made. Most "rubber band" tracks (the ones I have seen) are poorly made. It is nearly impossible to remove flash from them. And as pointed out above the subject is important as well. For example, Shermans, no need for track sag, so band tracks would work well. I have used one of the DML DS band tracks, for the M4A2 Tarawa, they were great. If DML wanted to bring out a full range of them sold seperatly I believe they would sell like hotcakes. But the bottom line (generally) is how well (accuracy as well as manufacture) each individual link is molded, and usually you get better looking links with individual plastic ones, or better yet, resin. IMHO Modelkasten rules, but its sometimes hard to justify a replacement set of tracks that cost more then the whole kit.
 
Thread Listing 
  Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Glenn Bartolotti - Jun 30, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Paul A. Owen - Jun 30, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - gerry gardiner - Jun 30, 2008
. . . i hate link tracks - David Nickels - Jun 30, 2008
. . . . . . DAVID! - Glenn Bartolotti - Jun 30, 2008
. . . . . . . . . speaking of which - David Nickels - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Ryan Martinez - Jun 30, 2008
. . . . . . Ryan to do Tiger 1 with.... - Mike Riedeman - Jul 1, 2008
. . . I don't see them dissapearing - Benjamin Wainer - Jun 30, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - James Phillips - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Juan Contreras - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Sean Langley - Jul 1, 2008
. . . . . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - James Phillips - Jul 1, 2008
. . . compromise? - Dave Murray - Jul 1, 2008
. . . . . . Re: compromise? - Glenn Bartolotti - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Why not more link & length? - Charles Harrison - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Friul metal tracks rule - Frank Forster - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Bill Goodrich - Jul 1, 2008
. . . . . . I agree totally with Bill.(n/t) - Ray Peterson - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Things to consider - Herve Charbonneau - Jul 1, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Cesar Oliva Atienza - Jul 2, 2008
. . . Re: Rubber band tracks.... their future? - Vernon - Jul 11, 2008
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link