Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 7 
   IndustrySep 6 
   Shows & ClubsSep 7 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 6
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 7
   ContestsSep 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 5 
   ConstructionSep 6 
   PaintingSep 7 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleSep 6 
   Small ScaleSep 6 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 7 
   Post WW2Sep 6 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 5 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.
Topics  2964
Messages  21975
 Subject:  Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releasesList thread.  
  
 Date:  May 20, 2002
 From:  Neville Lord 
I also think there's little market for these things, the general complaint
about
model kits these days are the high prices

Hi,

thanks for all your comments guys. Looks like it may not be a flyer. I
agree that it will only work itf the manufacturers gets the accuracy almost
100%.

The idea behind the standard kit would aim at the price sensitive end of the
market which is where I expect the bulk of sales would be. This lower cost
ooption is designed to address the compalint Jan-Willem identified

The reason I beleive there would be sufficient demand for the "master"
option of the standard kits is that a core group of modellers do spent a
small fortune on their kits, as evident by the mass of accesory
manufacturers Also by putting a good number of the accessories into one
box would present the item as a "solution", something which does work in
other industries, and a package will alos integrate it into the cheaper main
stream modelling distribution chain while saving the customer the hassle of
tracking down numerous parts mail order.

Cheers

Neville
 
Thread Listing 
  What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Tim Streeter - May 19, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Rick Young & Carol MacLennan-Young - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Yuchung Wang - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - C Bolick - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - of Panzermodeler.com - May 21, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 21, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Christophe Jacquemont - May 21, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 22, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Christophe Jacquemont - May 23, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 23, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Paul A. Owen - May 19, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Steve Frost - May 19, 2002
. . . . . . Cloth texture? - roy chow - May 22, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: Cloth texture? - Steve Frost - May 21, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Cloth texture? - MSW - May 22, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - MSW - May 20, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Alex Hodges - May 20, 2002
. . . What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Neville Lord - May 20, 2002
. . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 20, 2002
. . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Jan-Willem de Boer - May 20, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Neville Lord - May 20, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Kim Voss - May 23, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 23, 2002
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Tim Streeter - May 23, 2002
. . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Ken Hartlen - May 20, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 20, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Tim Streeter - May 20, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Peter Ong - May 20, 2002
. . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Alex Hodges - May 21, 2002
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link