|
|
Forums - News / General |
For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby. |
| Topics | 2964 |
| Messages | 21975 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases |  |
| Date: | May 23, 2002 |
| From: | Kim Voss | |
Hi Neville,
I see one flaw in your otherwise excellent idea. If the model manufacturers
were to do this for these master kits, it is now them that has to round up these
items from the aftermarket manufacturers and they will tack on their little bit
for doing so. Then there is the little bit tacked on for the unbelievable
logistics in making sure that all these master kits contain what they are
supposed. The storage, inventory control, shipping and receiving, etc. of these
aftermarket items will all be added into the final price. You have to remember
that Tamiya, Dragon and Italeri would all be doing this on a large scale as
compared to some small resin manufacturer that includes these items in their
kits.
And just as a side bar for those that feel the manufacturers should already
include certain details in their kits, the approximate amount it cost
Revell/Monogram for the molds for one car kit is upwards of $150,000.00. So the
more detail you want in your kits the more it cost Tamiya to make the molds and
that cost is past on to us. Case in point the Dragon Wagon and the Famo!!
Okay, I'm ready to get hammered on this now!!
Kim Voss
Neville Lord wrote:
> Also by putting a good number of the accessories into one
> box would present the item as a "solution", something which does work in
> other industries, and a package will alos integrate it into the cheaper main
> stream modelling distribution chain while saving the customer the hassle of
> tracking down numerous parts mail order.
>
> Cheers
>
> Neville |
| |
|
|
 | What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Tim Streeter - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Rick Young & Carol MacLennan-Young - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Yuchung Wang - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - C Bolick - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Charlie Murphy - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - of Panzermodeler.com - May 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Christophe Jacquemont - May 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 22, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Christophe Jacquemont - May 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Warrink - May 23, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Paul A. Owen - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Steve Frost - May 19, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Cloth texture? - roy chow - May 22, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Cloth texture? - Steve Frost - May 21, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Cloth texture? - MSW - May 22, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - MSW - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Alex Hodges - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Neville Lord - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Jan-Willem de Boer - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Neville Lord - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Kim Voss - May 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Tim Streeter - May 23, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Ken Hartlen - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: What Should Be ...-"Master" and "Std" series releases - Christophe Jacquemont - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Tim Streeter - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Peter Ong - May 20, 2002 |
| . . . Re: What Should Be the Next BIG Innovation in AFV Modeling? - Alex Hodges - May 21, 2002 |
|
|
