Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 9 
   IndustryOct 10 
   Shows & ClubsOct 9 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 9
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 10
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 8 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 10 
   Post WW2Oct 8 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 10 
   CommercialOct 3 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2988
Messages  22329
 Subject:  Not as easy as it soundsList thread.  
  
 Date:  May 5, 2004
 From:  Peter Ong 
The problem with picking a 1/35 hull is that, technically, the hull has to fit in the C-130. By using the dimensions of the hold of the C-130 as a constraint, and the width and length of the donor vehicle, one can see problems. Try shoehorning an Abrams hull in a C-130. If one poses a 1/35 figure next to the FCS conversion, one can indeed see the width of the Abrams hull and automatically say this conversion is bogus.

The best 1/35 hulls would be the Stingray, MTVL, CCVL, or M8 AGS since these have the correct size and roadwheel configurations. If one uses say the Paladin or M1, then the hatches and everything else would have to be a lot larger and force the model to have a scale of 1/25 scale instead of 1/35 since the FCSs aren't that large. If one poses a 1/25 soldier next to a 1/35 Abrams hull, that'll work since that forces the Abrams hull to appear smaller than the figure.

My rant has more to do with raising a flag to the fact that there are still many areas left unexplored in the 1/35 AFV arena. The "unbelievable" I stated comes from the fact that the FCS looks so strikingly simple, and yet no 1/35 vehicle, save perhaps the Sheridan or Scimitar (but wrong number of roadwheels), can even match it in size, never mind looks. So there still exists room and generas for model companies to expand to.

Of course the FCS is all conjecture so anything goes :-). I'm not going to sweat this one. However, this is very similar to going to the model shop for a modern police car or fire engine and finding zippo. Sure, such models may not sell, but it is amazing to know that the "modern" plastic fire engine kit is around 1970s style.
One can get a truck and try to make a pumper out of it, but the results just aren't the same :-).

There are still AFV generas unexplored up for companies to grab...FAVs being one of them :-).

Peter
 
Thread Listing 
  1/35 Future Combat System Model? Un-buh-lee-vable! - Peter Ong - May 1, 2004
. . . Re: 1/35 Future Combat System Model? Un-buh-lee-vable! - Paul Roberts - May 4, 2004
. . . . . . Not as easy as it sounds - Peter Ong - May 5, 2004
. . . . . . Re: 1/35 Future Combat System Model? Un-buh-lee-vable! - adam lehmann - May 9, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link