Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 6 
   IndustrySep 6 
   Shows & ClubsSep 6 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 6
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 7
   ContestsSep 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 5 
   ConstructionSep 6 
   PaintingSep 6 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleSep 6 
   Small ScaleSep 6 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 7 
   Post WW2Sep 6 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 5 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.
Topics  2964
Messages  21973
 Subject:  Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.buildList thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 26, 2004
 From:  Leo Lee 
Hi, James,

I am not putting the 2 kits in the same breath. Sorry to cause some misunderstanding.

The DML Pz1b is one very good kit. Only major issues are:

1. the multi side panel hull will require some good filling. (especially on the engine deck) Lionroar provides a rear hull doesn't mean I opt to use it, only that they also see it as a "problem". I can live with the putty work, but I want to see what Lionroar can do before I move on.

2. The fenders are very thick. That's why I am waiting for the PE set.

Cheers

Leo
 
Thread Listing 
  Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PE fenders - steve campbell - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Christophe Jacquemont - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Charlie Murphy - Jul 27, 2004
. . . In the end just an opinion anyway - David Nickels - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . In Box Reviews - Frank De Sisto - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Peter Ong - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Terry Ashley - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Reviews Help Customers, But Are Weapons Too. - Peter Ong - Jul 28, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - David Cote - Jul 29, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 29, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link