Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 12 
   IndustryOct 11 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 12
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 12
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 12 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 12 
   Post WW2Oct 10 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 12 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.
Topics  2990
Messages  22336
 Subject:  Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.buildList thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 26, 2004
 From:  Paul A. Owen 
> The fenders are very thick.
> That's why I am waiting for the PE set.

I've had it with PE fenders. I have some Pz. 38(t), Luchs and Cromwell fenders from Aber. They are next to impossible to emboss properly. Plus the edges are too sharp when bent. I made a set for my Tasca Luchs from 0.010 styrene which look a lot better. I do like the mounting brackets from these kits however.

Paul.
 
Thread Listing 
  Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PE fenders - steve campbell - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Christophe Jacquemont - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Charlie Murphy - Jul 27, 2004
. . . In the end just an opinion anyway - David Nickels - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . In Box Reviews - Frank De Sisto - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Peter Ong - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Terry Ashley - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Reviews Help Customers, But Are Weapons Too. - Peter Ong - Jul 28, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - David Cote - Jul 29, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 29, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link