Track-Link - Forums

Home Articles Reviews Gallery Contests Forums

Search

Login

Forums

Introduction

Posting guidelines

Forum key

New Messages

Forum List

News Forums
General	Oct 14
Industry	Oct 13
Shows & Clubs	Oct 12

Site Forums
Articles	May 16
Build Logs	Oct 13
Reviews	Sep 22
Gallery	Oct 13
Contests	Oct 13

Modelling Forums
Kits	Oct 13
Construction	Oct 13
Painting	Oct 10
Figures	Oct 10
Dioramas	Oct 13
1-48th Scale	Oct 13
Small Scale	Sep 23

Research Forums
WW2	Oct 13
Post WW2	Oct 13
Pre WW2	Sep 6

Classifieds Ads
Buy & Sell	Oct 13
Commercial	Oct 10

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics	2992
Messages	22359

Subject:

PE fenders

Date:

Jul 27, 2004

From:

steve campbell

Paul, I've just built a set of fenders for the DML StuG III/B from the "Part" pe company and found them fantastic. They have an ""under" frame, that the tread-plate sits on, that bends with a rounded edge. It's in the way that they have done it by a set of fine lines that bend round without any props at all. The only down side is that the PE parts needed to mount the lights and horn are on another set!!
They can also be built in segments if you wish only to do parts of the fenders.
I can't speak about other sets from PART but I'm very impressed with this set.
steve

Thread Listing

Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PE fenders - steve campbell - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Christophe Jacquemont - Jul 27, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Charlie Murphy - Jul 27, 2004

. . . In the end just an opinion anyway - David Nickels - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . In Box Reviews - Frank De Sisto - Jul 27, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Peter Ong - Jul 27, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Terry Ashley - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004

. . . . . . . . . Reviews Help Customers, But Are Weapons Too. - Peter Ong - Jul 28, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004

. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - David Cote - Jul 29, 2004

. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 29, 2004

Home Articles Reviews Gallery Contests Forums

Contact Track-Link