Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 7 
   IndustryOct 7 
   Shows & ClubsOct 6 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 6
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 7
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 7 
   ConstructionOct 6 
   PaintingOct 2 
   FiguresOct 7 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 7 
   Post WW2Oct 7 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 7 
   CommercialOct 3 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.
Topics  2987
Messages  22316
 Subject:  Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.buildList thread.  
  
 Date:  Jul 27, 2004
 From:  Paul A. Owen 
Yes James I was referring to you, in the thread view you can see I was replying to you. The tracks totally suck, I was going to throw them out. The Kasten ones are far better. It looks like Fruilmodel chopped up the Tamiya track to form a single link for the master. Thus capturing the errors in the Tamiya track quite well... but they sag, so that's worth $40 right there to be sure. (A note for the reactionary anti-nit-picker brigade... I am being sarcastic).

Is that your model? Nice use of the kit parts to detail the PE.

Paul.
 
Thread Listing 
  Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PE fenders - steve campbell - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Christophe Jacquemont - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Charlie Murphy - Jul 27, 2004
. . . In the end just an opinion anyway - David Nickels - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . In Box Reviews - Frank De Sisto - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Peter Ong - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Terry Ashley - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Reviews Help Customers, But Are Weapons Too. - Peter Ong - Jul 28, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004
. . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - David Cote - Jul 29, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 29, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link