|
|
Forums - News / General |
For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby. |
| Topics | 2992 |
| Messages | 22359 |
|
|
| Subject: | In Box Reviews |  |
| Date: | Jul 27, 2004 |
| From: | Frank De Sisto | |
I have been writing in-box reviews since the late 1980s and would certainly not waste my time if I thought they were useless to all modelers.
Many modelers, myself included, wish to take advantage of some "recon" that has been performed before we decide to make a purchase.
When I do an in-box review, I always cut apart the main parts and do a dry fit to see where problems may lurk. I just did so with the DML Pz. I Ausf. B, but took it a step further in that I actually glued the outer panels in plsce, after careful dry-fiting and clean up. Result? No gaps, no problems. See my review on Missing Links.
For this, a friend has christened me "the incomplete modeler".
Another thing I like about in-box reviews is that one can see what other things come in a kit. For instance, what markings are given, what options are given and of course, what problems the reviewer may have discovered.
Not to mention that a picture is worth a thousand words, so I am very grateful when a reviewer takes the extra time from building models to include images with the review.
In box reviews? GIVE ME MORE!!!
Frank
delete BYTEME from email |
| |
|
|
 | Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PE fenders - steve campbell - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - D.T.Cote - Jul 26, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Christophe Jacquemont - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build [IMG] - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Charlie Murphy - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . In the end just an opinion anyway - David Nickels - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . In Box Reviews - Frank De Sisto - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Peter Ong - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Terry Ashley - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - James Tainton - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . . . . . . . Reviews Help Customers, But Are Weapons Too. - Peter Ong - Jul 28, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Paul A. Owen - Jul 27, 2004 |
| . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - David Cote - Jul 29, 2004 |
| . . . . . . Re: Reviews; in-bag vs.build - Leo Lee - Jul 29, 2004 |
|
|
