Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 12 
   IndustryOct 11 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 12
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 12
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 12 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 12 
   Post WW2Oct 10 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 12 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2990
Messages  22336
 Subject:  Re: Reviews - Too Many High RatingsList thread.  
  
 Date:  Mar 8, 2005
 From:  Veli-Pekka Pelttari 
True!
Could one solution be widening the scale to perhaps six stars for the best ones? That would equal the development in the industry. Then no older kits need to be re-reviewed, as those older four star kits would be just as good as they used to be, in absolute ratings. Alas, in comparison to new ones, everybody could see that they might be somewhat outdated but still good models when released.
Just my two eurocents,

V-P
 
Thread Listing 
  Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Paul A. Owen - Mar 8, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Kurt Laughlin - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . "Or are the reviewers just plain wrong?" - Steve Campbell - Mar 9, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Paul A. Owen - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Sean Lynch - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Paul A. Owen - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Ed Bouwmeester - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Paul A. Owen - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Steve Frost - Mar 9, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - gene fong - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . Belly buttons? - Kurt Laughlin - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Belly buttons? - Steve Frost - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Belly buttons? - Paul A. Owen - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Formal Warning! - Steve Campbell - Mar 10, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - David Manning - Mar 8, 2005
. . . . . . Yeah, I like this idea - Kevin Johnson - Mar 10, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Veli-Pekka Pelttari - Mar 8, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Peter Ong - Mar 9, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - terry li - Mar 9, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Extra stars - Leo Lee - Mar 9, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Steve Frost - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . Stars are OK - Kurt Laughlin - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Stars are OK - Paul A. Owen - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Hey lates review the reviewers!?! - Billy Bishop (Michael Wawrow) - Mar 9, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Stars are OK - Steve Frost - Mar 11, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - adam lehmann - Mar 10, 2005
. . . Well, I had one experience where.... - Mark Fergel - Mar 10, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Well, I had one experience where.... - gene fong - Mar 10, 2005
. . . Re: Reviews - Too Many High Ratings - Late Reply - Doug Chaltry - Mar 11, 2005
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link