Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 4 
   IndustrySep 4 
   Shows & ClubsSep 4 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 4
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 4
   ContestsSep 4
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 4 
   ConstructionSep 4 
   PaintingSep 4 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleAug 27 
   Small ScaleSep 4 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 4 
   Post WW2Sep 4 
   Pre WW2Aug 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 3 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - News / General

For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby.

Topics  2958
Messages  21948
 Subject:  Out of the box modelsList thread.  
  
 Date:  Mar 31, 2005
 From:  Matthew Malogorski 
I wanted to comment on Out of the Box Models. Many models in the TL gallery use the line "straight out of the box" in the comments section. Other than who ever's photo etch set, aftermarket tracks, aftermarket gun barrel, & misc scratch built parts that were added to the model, it is not "straight out of the box". I would like to say, please stop using this OOB sentence. The model is nowhere near OOB if you used and did all this stuff to it. It is misleading.
 
Thread Listing 
  Out of the box models - Matthew Malogorski - Mar 31, 2005
. . . Re: Out of the box models - Paul A. Owen - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Out of the box models - Matthew W. Malogorski - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Out of the box models - Paul A. Owen - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . No, that would be... - Ken Hartlen - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: No, that would be... - Matthew W. Malogorski - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: No, that would be... - gene fong - Mar 31, 2005
. . . Well. . . - Kurt Laughlin - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . Re: Well. . . - gene fong - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . Re: Well. . . - Paul A. Owen - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Well. . . - gene fong - Mar 31, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Well. . . - Steve Campbell - Apr 14, 2005
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Well. . . - Doug Chaltry - Apr 15, 2005
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link