|
|
Forums - News / General |
For General modelling or hobby-related topics that are not covered by any other specific forum. Please keep to topics concerning the hobby. |
| Topics | 2965 |
| Messages | 21985 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Why 1/35? |  |
| Date: | Jun 23, 2005 |
| From: | Ray Peterson | |
I was just saying that is what Mr. Tamiya wrote in his book about it. He didn't mention about simplifying from metric, if that was the case, I would think we would have ended up with 1/30th (which is what those early Russian kits were) or maybe 1/25th - which they came out with later.
1/32nd is not a simplification, it is an Architectural scale, 3/8"=1'-0". |
| |
|
|
 | Why 1/35? - Simon Tsun - Jun 19, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Frank Blanton - Jun 20, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Johan Detruyer - Jun 20, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why 1/32? - Kurt Laughlin - Jun 20, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why 1/35? - adam lehmann - Jun 21, 2005 |
| . . . . . . 1/32 aircraft releases show great finesse & detail - Roy Chow - Jun 21, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: 1/32 aircraft releases show great finesse & detail - adam lehmann - Jun 22, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Dave Manning - Jun 21, 2005 |
| . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Ray Peterson - Jun 21, 2005 |
| . . . . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Al Bowie - Jun 22, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why 1/35? - RC Hill - Jun 22, 2005 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Why 1/35? - Ray Peterson - Jun 23, 2005 |
|
|
