Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralSep 4 
   IndustrySep 4 
   Shows & ClubsSep 4 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsSep 4
   ReviewsAug 13
   GallerySep 4
   ContestsSep 4
 Modelling Forums
   KitsSep 4 
   ConstructionSep 4 
   PaintingSep 4 
   FiguresAug 31 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleAug 27 
   Small ScaleSep 4 
 Research Forums
   WW2Sep 4 
   Post WW2Sep 4 
   Pre WW2Aug 17 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellSep 3 
   CommercialSep 5 
 

Forums - Research / Post-WW2

This Post WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to any time after WW2 (1945+) subjects.

Topics  1386
Messages  5008
 Subject:  Re: "Enigma" ?List thread.  
  
 Date:  Jan 6, 2003
 From:  Artur Zinatullin 
> I do not believe this at all.
> If this were true, parts made at different factories - or plates
> cut in different rooms of the same factory - would not fit together.
> Suspensions would not work because torsion bars would not be able to reach their mounts.
> Driveshafts would not fit between transmissions and final drives.
> Turrets would drop through their races.
Well, what can I say...
There are more critical and less critical dimensions in every detail things are assembled.
For example, if the turret ring diameter is critical, turret height is quite free to vary.
What is critical, and what is not, and how to avoid does'not'fit problems, is an art of constructor and technologist.

> Cutting and fitting is the most time-consuming way of making things there is.
> It also requires the most skillful operators because a job done improperly simply won't work.
And now imagine, at what conditions tanks were made at wartime.
Tank plants were evacueted and rebuilt on new places.
Plant workers are mostly former farmers.
Number of experienced workers are in tranches at front.
Etc, etc...
And don't forget, that major industrialisation of totally agricultural Russia was started just in 1920s. So, industrial production
culture is just forming.

> 25mm simply does not make any sense.
> How would it be justified in the environment of life or death
> production to spend an additional hour putting in 10 more kilos of weld metal?
Decreasing a cut and assembly persition from 2mm (barely possible in that conditions) to 25mm is a great save of time and effort
too.

> I know from my research that such problems were viewed very critically in the American system.
Oh, please. Don't compare american and soviet system.
In american car plant, when whindshield doesn't fit in car body, hull is thrown away and workers who assembled it are fired.
Soviet workers just make hull straight with 8 kg hammers.
That's not a joke at all.

BTW, it took 40-50 kg of soldering lead to correct assembling err on GAZ M20 Pobeda hull in 1950s.

> Do you think that a plant manager under Stalin or Hitler would be more willing to take the risk?
If plant manager fails to make a number of tanks planned...

I have lived in USSR for about 15 years.
Soviet industry production was crude. It really was.

artur@merit.ee :: Artur Zinatullin :: GSM +37 251 11859
guitar, blues, love, friends, summer, !violence, !rush
 
Thread Listing 
  Iraqi T-55 up-armored - Dave Connolly - Dec 25, 2002
. . . As for plane T-55, ... - Artur Zinatullin - Dec 25, 2002
. . . Re: artistic license? - Christophe Jacquemont - Dec 26, 2002
. . . . . . don't think so - Janusz Smolinski - Dec 27, 2002
. . . . . . . . . Re: don't think so - Christophe Jacquemont - Jan 2, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . "Enigma" ? - Janusz Smolinski - Jan 3, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Artur Zinatullin - Jan 4, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Kurt Laughlin - Jan 4, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Kim Voss - Jan 6, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Artur Zinatullin - Jan 6, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Christophe Jacquemont - Jan 6, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Paul Roberts - Jan 7, 2003
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Enigma" ? - Artur Zinatullin - Jan 7, 2003
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link