|
|
Forums - Research / Post-WW2 |
This Post WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to any time after WW2 (1945+) subjects. |
| Topics | 1399 |
| Messages | 5047 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Question about Abrams |  |
| Date: | Apr 7, 2003 |
| From: | Christophe Jacquemont | |
Because the Abrams skirts are already armoured whereas the Challenger II has rubber skirts as standard?
Cheers,
Christophe
tim white wrote:
> While Challengers have an add-on armour pack the news shots I have seen of Abrams’s (some abandoned) appear not to have this.
>
> Why is this? Are they upgraded but not as noticeable, perhaps it is not deemed necessary or the 'standard' skirts are better than Challengers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tim |
| |
|
|
 | Question about Abrams - tim white - Apr 7, 2003 |
| . . . Re: Question about Abrams - Christophe Jacquemont - Apr 7, 2003 |
| . . . Re: Question about Abrams - Peter Ong - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . Plus... - David Nickels - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: Plus... - Captain Swoop - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Plus... - John Harris - Apr 11, 2003 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Plus... - Captain Swoop - Apr 14, 2003 |
| . . . . . . M1 Side skirts - Scott Dimmick - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . 100 Tons?!? - Scott Taylor - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: 100 Tons?!? - tim white - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . Re: Question about Abrams - Neil Whiteley-Bolton - Apr 8, 2003 |
| . . . . . . . . . I said what TIME said... - Peter Ong - Apr 9, 2003 |
| . . . . . . Re: Question about Abrams - Captain Swoop - Apr 8, 2003 |
|
|
