|
|
Forums - Research / Post-WW2 |
This Post WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to any time after WW2 (1945+) subjects. |
| Topics | 1378 |
| Messages | 4981 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore | |
| Date: | May 23, 2001 |
| From: | Tuve B | |
In 93 i heard it was 4500m, later i've heard that 4000m is the correct
distance.
Who knows the correct story about this kill?
Regarding Kurt's comment, where will it sit or how many times round the world
in 2050? ;-)
Tuve |
| |
|
|
 | 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Graham - May 17, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Steve Tyliszczak - May 17, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Axel Ackens - May 17, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - David Nickels - May 18, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Andreas J. Elesky - May 18, 2001 |
| . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Haydn Neal - May 20, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm Rif vs 120mm SB - Don't forget HEAT - Nemanja Pavlovic - May 18, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Kurt Isbrecht - May 19, 2001 |
| . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Lawrence Salerno - May 19, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Andreas J. Elesky - May 19, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Shooty - May 21, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Lawrence Salerno - May 22, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Graeme - May 22, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Kurt Laughlin - May 23, 2001 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore - Tuve B - May 23, 2001 |
| . . . Re: 105mm versus 120 smoothbore-logistics - mark hazzard - May 22, 2001 |
|
|