Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralOct 12 
   IndustryOct 12 
   Shows & ClubsOct 12 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsOct 12
   ReviewsSep 22
   GalleryOct 12
   ContestsOct 6
 Modelling Forums
   KitsOct 9 
   ConstructionOct 12 
   PaintingOct 10 
   FiguresOct 10 
   DioramasAug 29 
   1-48th ScaleOct 1 
   Small ScaleSep 23 
 Research Forums
   WW2Oct 12 
   Post WW2Oct 10 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellOct 12 
   CommercialOct 10 
 

Forums - Research / WW2

This WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to WW2 (1939-1945) subjects.

Topics  3356
Messages  14979
 Subject:  Re: Field applied Zimmerit???List thread.  
  
 Date:  Jan 20, 2006
 From:  Gerald Owens 
I also would tend to believe that nearly all Zimmerit was factory applied, even the sloppy stuff. Consider the application process: a skim coat is smeared over the primer and is textured in a rough pattern of little squares using the edge of the trowel. The entire surface then had to be hardened with an alcohol torch to burn off the benzene thinner (otherwise, Zimmerit took eight days to dry). The following day a second coat was applied, and the final finish pattern was pressed or combed into the putty, either using the edge of the trowel in a "breaking wave" pattern or using a sheet metal comb or stamp. Then the whole vehicle had to be cooked again with the alcohol lamp (in some factories, the second coat was skipped--many Panther Ausf. A and early Jagdpanthers apparently only have the first coat). Finally, the whole vehicle had to be painted.
Can you imagine even a rear area maintenance unit bothering with all that under wartime conditions, when they were under huge pressure to repair disabled and battle-damaged vehicles and get them back to the front? And consider, was Zimmerit just a solution in search of a problem? It would seem the biggest users of magnetic mines on the Eastern Front were the Germans themselves, as they were standard issue for engineer units. My references indicate that Russian hollow-charge antitank grenades were designed to be thrown, not applied by hand (similar to the German Wurfmine). Was Russian use of magnetic mines actually documented or was the whole Zimmerit program just a precaution? In any event, Zimmerit was not missed after its use was banned in September, 1944. Gotta wonder if the Zimmer Paint Company might have gotten the contract in the first place because they spread some money around the right Party officials...
 
Thread Listing 
  Field applied Zimmerit??? - Glenn Bartolotti - Jan 13, 2006
. . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Robert Lockie - Jan 14, 2006
. . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Roy Chow - Jan 14, 2006
. . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Robert Anderson - Jan 14, 2006
. . . . . . Thanks Robert - Glenn Bartolotti - Jan 15, 2006
. . . . . . . . . Robert here's a pic [IMG] - Glenn Bartolotti - Jan 15, 2006
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Robert here's a pic - Robert Anderson - Jan 15, 2006
. . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Gerald Owens - Jan 20, 2006
. . . . . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Christopher C. Tew - Jan 20, 2006
. . . Great thoughts guys! - Glenn Bartolotti - Jan 20, 2006
. . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Christopher C.Tew - Jan 11, 2007
. . . . . . Re: Field applied Zimmerit??? - Steven Byrne - Jan 11, 2007
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link