|
|
Forums - Research / WW2 |
This WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to WW2 (1939-1945) subjects. |
| Topics | 3352 |
| Messages | 14956 |
|
|
| Subject: | Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? | |
| Date: | Dec 12, 2002 |
| From: | Adam Vukich | |
In regards to the StuG IVs in the 17th SS, everything that I have read has
said that the unit (i.e. the entire 17th SS) was operating a total of 42
StuG IVs at the beginning of the conflict and most of those were destroyed
or abandoned. Unfortunately, I don't know the allocation of StuG IIIs or
what type they were.
HTH,
Adam Vukich
"Jean-Vincent Roy" wrote in message
news:3df8da25$1@news.track-link.net...
>
> > And there may be an Armes et Militaria Hors Serie issue that could help
> you. Again, I don't know if they have published one on > that part of the
> fighting, but there are a few titles in that series relating to the
Normandy
> campaign. I have a
> > couple, and will take a look tonight.
>
> Thanks for your time guys,
>
> From what I've found on the web, it appears the 17 SS Sturmgeschütz
Regiment
> did have a mix of StuG III and IV. What I would like to know is the exact
> allocation for both types, and whether the IIIs where of the early or late
> type. Chris Leeman's Photophile no 1 on the Stug IV speaks of a total of
37
> StuG IV allocated in March (20) and April (17) out of 42. But is 42 for
one
> abteilung or the whole regiment ? That I do not know. As for Armes et
> Militaria, I'll try to found out and see where I could possibly get the
> proper title.
>
> Any knowledge of 17 SSpzgren. dry transfer or decal sheet out there? I
> suppose there is some Waffen SS mix around ?
>
> In any case, your help is much appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Jean-Vincent
>
> |
| |
|
|
 | StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 12, 2002 |
| . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Joe Cleere - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Andrew Herbert - Dec 12, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 12, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Adam Vukich - Dec 12, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Eric Bachmann - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 12, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Ralph Persico - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Adam Vukich - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Adam Vukich - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Adam Vukich - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Adam Vukich - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG III from 17.SS OOB - Ralph Persico - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Andy Herbert - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: Info from a Historical Re-enactor Group - Ralph Persico - Dec 13, 2002 |
| . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - James Bilbrey - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 14, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - James Bilbrey - Dec 17, 2002 |
| . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: StuG IIIs vs 101st AB ? - Jean-Vincent Roy - Dec 17, 2002 |
|
|