Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralDec 2 
   IndustryDec 2 
   Shows & ClubsNov 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsDec 2
   ReviewsNov 29
   GalleryDec 2
   ContestsDec 2
 Modelling Forums
   KitsDec 2 
   ConstructionDec 2 
   PaintingDec 2 
   FiguresDec 2 
   DioramasNov 11 
   1-48th ScaleNov 26 
   Small ScaleNov 25 
 Research Forums
   WW2Dec 2 
   Post WW2Nov 29 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellDec 2 
   CommercialNov 26 
 

Forums - Research / WW2

This WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to WW2 (1939-1945) subjects.

Topics  3414
Messages  15262
 Subject:  Oops, meant to add......List thread.  
  
 Date:  Nov 14, 2004
 From:  Mark Rethoret 
In regards to statements about the "accuracy" of DML's towers my reply was predicated on the idea of using them as the basis for scratch building an accurate interior. With that in mind your comment about "inaccurate armor plate" is somewhat uncalled for.

Not intending to start a fight here, just clearing up a point.


Take care,

Mark
 
Thread Listing 
  Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes - SJKarver - Nov 11, 2004
. . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes [IMG] - Mati Raudsep - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - SJKarver - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Mati Raudsepp - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Kurt Laughlin - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Mark Rethoret - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Oops, meant to add...... - Mark Rethoret - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Oops, meant to add...... - Kurt Laughlin - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Inaccurate" was accurate - SJKarver - Nov 21, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Inaccurate" was accurate - Mati Raudsepp - Nov 22, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Inaccurate" was accurate - SJKarver - Nov 23, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link