Advertisement
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Search Login
Forums
 Introduction
 Posting guidelines
 Forum key
New Messages
Forum List
 News Forums
   GeneralDec 2 
   IndustryDec 2 
   Shows & ClubsNov 18 
 Site Forums
   ArticlesMay 16
   Build LogsDec 2
   ReviewsNov 29
   GalleryDec 2
   ContestsDec 2
 Modelling Forums
   KitsDec 2 
   ConstructionDec 2 
   PaintingDec 2 
   FiguresDec 2 
   DioramasNov 11 
   1-48th ScaleNov 26 
   Small ScaleNov 25 
 Research Forums
   WW2Dec 2 
   Post WW2Nov 29 
   Pre WW2Sep 6 
 Classifieds Ads
   Buy & SellDec 2 
   CommercialNov 26 
 

Forums - Research / WW2

This WW2 forum is intended for asking and discussing reference or historical related issues pertaining to WW2 (1939-1945) subjects.

Topics  3414
Messages  15262
 Subject:  Re: "Inaccurate" was accurateList thread.  
  
 Date:  Nov 23, 2004
 From:  SJKarver 
G'day, MR,
Thanks for the info. Would it be appropriate to call these "inaccurate"? Given the scale and detail of the interior, they are clearly meant to be seen one way or the other, and some builders are making the upper removable in order to show off their great work on this kit. One guy went so far as to scratch the unviewable battery box, without, however, addressing the suspension towers. I guess this is what makes for horse races...

Regards,
SJK
 
Thread Listing 
  Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes - SJKarver - Nov 11, 2004
. . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes [IMG] - Mati Raudsep - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - SJKarver - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Mati Raudsepp - Nov 11, 2004
. . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Kurt Laughlin - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Dragon's T-34 Spring Boxes vs. the real thing - Mark Rethoret - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . Oops, meant to add...... - Mark Rethoret - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: Oops, meant to add...... - Kurt Laughlin - Nov 14, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Inaccurate" was accurate - SJKarver - Nov 21, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Inaccurate" was accurate - Mati Raudsepp - Nov 22, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re: "Inaccurate" was accurate - SJKarver - Nov 23, 2004
    Home        Articles        Reviews        Gallery        Contests        Forums     Contact Track-Link